PATTERNS OF SUSTAINABLE FOOD CONSUMPTION IN HUNGARY: A CLUSTER ANALYSIS

 

DOWNLOAD DOI: 10.62897/COS2025.3-1.153

Brigitta Unger-Plasek*
Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Villányi street 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary
plasek.brigitta@uni-mate.hu


Abstract: Understanding consumer behaviour related to sustainable food consumption is key to expanding what is still a niche market for sustainable products. While there is no universal definition of sustainable food consumption, the literature agrees on a few core principles, like reducing overconsumption, minimizing food waste, limiting ultra-processed food intake, and shifting diets toward more plant-based and less animal-based products (Hoek et al., 2021). This study explores how these principles are reflected in the behaviour of consumers in the Hungarian market, and which consumer segments can be identified accordingly. Data were collected through an online survey of 750 participants and analysed in IBM SPSS 29.0. Hierarchical and k means clustering were used to identify and assign cluster groups, followed by Chi square tests to examine significant differences between them. Based on the dendrogram and the change of agglomeration schedule coefficients, a five-cluster solution was selected. The Undecided cluster was the largest, characterised by neutral responses towards all principles. The Committed showed consistently high agreement across all statements. Selective Sustainers mainly adopted low-effort practices while expressing a desire for further improvement, whereas low-effort environmentalists limited their engagement to convenient actions without such aspirations. The Disengaged exhibited uniformly low agreement across all dimensions.


 

REFERENCES

  • Clayton S., Karazsia B. T., 2020, Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101434, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434.
  • Essary C.R., Fischer L.M., Irlbeck E., 2022, A Statistical Approach to Classification: A guide to hierarchical cluster analysis in agricultural communications research. Journal of Applied Communications, 106(3), 3, DOI: 10.4148/1051-0834.2431.
  • Hoek A.C., Malekpour S., Raven R., Court E., Byrne E. 2021, Towards environmentally sustainable food systems: decision-making factors in sustainable food production and consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 610-626, DOI: 1016/j.spc.2020.12.009.
  • IBM Corp, 2023, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 29.0.1.0, IBM Corp Armonk, NY, USA.
  • O’Neill C., McCarthy M.B., O’Reilly S., Alfnes F., 2023, Food interests, preferences and behaviours: a profile of the sustainable food consumer. British Food Journal, 125(13), 352-374, DOI:10.1108/BFJ-09-2022-0762.
  • Schäufele-Elbers I., Janssen M., 2023, Consumer segmentation based on three dimensions of sustainable food consumption: A simultaneous analysis of meat, organic food, and sweet snack purchases based on household panel data in Germany. Frontiers in Nutrition, 10, 1140636, DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1140636.
  • Verain M.C., Dagevos H., Antonides G., 2015, Sustainable food consumption. Product choice or curtailment? Appetite, 91, 375-384, DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.055.
  • Wunsch N.-G., 2025, Consumers’ likeliness of buying & eating sustainable food in selected EU countries in 2021 to 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1372578/consumers-likeliness-of-buying-andeating-sustainable-food-in-eu-countries/, accessed 17.04.2025.

Connection

E-mail address: cos@sze.hu